Living wage: a global battle

The right to be paid a living wage is a basic entitlement of all working people the world over, whether they work in the public or private sectors, in the global South or North.

The living wage differs from statutory minimum wages in that it is calculated according to workers’ needs, not the demands of the labour market.

A living wage ensures that working people can earn enough to meet all their daily expenses and have some discretionary income left over to invest in their own or their children’s future.

The past four decades have seen a dramatic increase in the share of global wealth going to the most powerful corporations, their bosses and their owners. As labour’s share of national income has declined around the world, there has been a parallel rise in the number of workers who find themselves trapped in poverty despite having a job – the so-called ‘working poor’.

Millions of low paid workers around the globe spend their lives toiling in mines, factories, fields and offices, yet never manage to earn enough to lift themselves or their children out of poverty. The situation is especially stark for women and migrant workers, who face particular challenges in organising and demanding fair pay.

War on Want has long called for all workers to be paid the living wage appropriate to their economic context as a basic right, not a voluntary extra over and above the statutory minimum set down by governments or national wage boards. The fight for all workers to enjoy decent terms and conditions is a central pillar of War on Want’s work for social justice. 

5 reasons for a living wage

 

A basic human right

It is the only way to ensure that all workers can enjoy the right to an adequate standard of living. If a worker does not receive a living wage for their labour, then they and their families are deprived of the possibility of obtaining many of the essential elements that contribute to a decent life: adequate housing, good nutrition, health, rest and access to education and culture. They are deprived of the freedom to make choices about their own lives.

Boosting local economies

Many opponents of a living wage argue that the imposition of fixed living wage rates would harm the poor by reducing the number of jobs available. Yet there is evidence that increasing wages for the lowest paid workers can actually boost the economy, rather than damage it. Low paid workers are generally able to save very little, if any, of their earnings, so any money that they earn is circulated straight back into the economy.

Fighting poverty

Low paid workers, who are never able to earn enough to meet their basic needs, are caught in a poverty trap where the combination of insecurity, low pay and long working hours prevents them from participating fully in family and community life. Low pay also traps children of poor families into a cycle of poverty that is passed down through generations. Demanding that all employers provide a living wage to all their workers is one way of challenging this cycle and helping families to break free from the poverty trap.

Benefits to employers

There is a growing body of evidence to support a business case for paying a living wage. Numerous research studies into ‘living wage workplaces’ have shown that the costs of paying a living wage are offset by benefits brought to the companies concerned. These benefits include reductions in absenteeism, better staff retention rates, improved productivity, improved staff motivation and loyalty to the company, the ability to attract better staff, savings on training costs, more stable, reliable services and enhancements to the organisation’s reputation.

Public savings

In the years since crisis hit the global economic system, governments around the world have adopted severe austerity programmes based on drastic cuts in public services and the welfare state. These cuts have had a direct impact on the lives of the working poor, further limiting their access to housing, health care, education, legal support and nutrition. The introduction of a comprehensive living wage is a way of reducing public spending without further reducing the quality of life for millions of families.

Latest news

The government played the public for fools, and lost

28 June 2017 - 1:30pm

War on Want in Red Pepper. The recent High Court ruling against the government proves that Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) tactics are totally legitimate. They are legal ways to hold government and companies to account, and they are being fought so hard because they are so effective.

Read more

Thousands take on the fight for decent housing in South Africa

27 June 2017 - 4:15pm

Close to ten thousand shack dwellers and people living in informal housing took to the streets of Durban to protest against state sanctioned violence against them. The protest, held yesterday, was to draw attention to the fact that shack dwellers, hostel dwellers and those living in squalid government housing are being killed during violent eviction clashes with police and anti-land invasion units. 

Read more

Join the conversation

The government played the public for fools, and lost. https://t.co/VNURnfX8as from @redpeppermag @WaronWant #BDShttps://t.co/qyGdq6JkCS 12 hours 2 min ago
A decade under siege: Gaza health sector nears collapse @AJEnglish https://t.co/4NHyAiJP90 #StopArmingIsrael 12 hours 47 min ago
RT @EC_magazine: 'When it comes to taking on abusive regimes, it is clear that local council divestment works' https://t.co/LmzcPw1G6r http… 1 day 12 hours ago